19.05.2025

𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—§π—›π—’π—¨π—šπ—›π—§ 𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—ͺπ—˜π—Ÿπ—–π—’π— π—˜π—— π—›π—˜π—₯ π—•π—”π—–π—ž

𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—§π—›π—’π—¨π—šπ—›π—§ 𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—ͺπ—˜π—Ÿπ—–π—’π— π—˜π—— π—›π—˜π—₯ π—•π—”π—–π—ž

twitter icon
⚠️ 𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—§π—›π—’π—¨π—šπ—›π—§ 𝗬𝗒𝗨 π—ͺπ—˜π—Ÿπ—–π—’π— π—˜π—— π—›π—˜π—₯ π—•π—”π—–π—ž.

π—¦π—›π—˜ π—™π—˜π—Ÿπ—§ π—Ÿπ—œπ—žπ—˜ π—¦π—›π—˜ π—ͺ𝗔𝗦 π—œπ—‘ π—§π—›π—˜ π—ͺ𝗔𝗬.

(And the legal risk doesn’t show up until she leaves - or challenges it.)

You followed the policy.

Her leave was covered.

Her job was β€œkept open.”

You even sent flowers.

But when she came back
↳ She wasn’t copied into the big decisions
↳ Her key clients had been reassigned
↳ Her manager assumed β€œshe probably wants less responsibility now”

No formal handover.
No clear expectation reset.
No reboarding strategy.

Just a silent downgrade dressed up as flexibility.

Under UK law, women must return to the same job after maternity leave
unless it’s not reasonably practicable, in which case a suitable alternative must be offered on no less favourable terms.

But if her return is handled without:
↳ Consultation
↳ Dialogue
↳ Review
↳ Any real human strategy

Then it’s not a role change.

It’s a removal.

This happened to me.
And not for the first time.
No - I’m not talking about the discrimination I suffered during my miscarriage.

I’m talking about what happened many years after that, at the hand of a different employer.

This time, it was pregnancy again.

Different situation. Same outcome.

I was offered a promotion to HR Director.

Then I shared I was pregnant.

The offer was β€œpaused.”

While on maternity leave, the company went into insolvency.

I was made redundant.

No meeting. No call. No process.

This time, it was by leaders who thought they were doing everything right.

That’s why I talk about women’s workplace rights - for men (and women).

Because if you don’t understand the issue, you become the issueβ€”even if you don’t mean to.

So here’s the question:

Could you say with confidence:
↳ β€œWe didn’t just follow policyβ€”we led with purpose”?
↳ β€œWe helped her reclaim her role, not reapply for it”?
↳ β€œWe built her back into the business, instead of working around her”?

Because if the answer is no…

Your greatest risk isn’t just legal.
It’s cultural.
It’s retention.

It’s everything.

Here’s what I implement for clients:
↳ Legally sound re-onboarding plans that go beyond paperwork
↳ Leadership coaching that prevents silent exclusion
↳ Performance alignment with flexibility - not sidelining
↳ Trust-driven communication that keeps women engaged - not edged out

And the outcome?
βœ”οΈ Women return with clarity
βœ”οΈ Leaders lead with confidence
βœ”οΈ And your workplace becomes safer for everyone

As your all-inclusive HR department for less than minimum wage

I don’t just tick boxes.

I show you how to lead women back without pushing them out.

If your policy says the job is open - but she comes back to confusion and silence,
was it ever really open at all?
https://lnkd.in/eSXgRSX5

♻️ REPOST to help your network lead women back with intention
β–ΆοΈŽ Follow Tina S. Rahman for trauma-aware, women-wise HR and leadership
  • HR & Legal advice
  • Leadership & Management
  • HR Compliance
  • employment advice
  • Manager Development

Founder of HR Habitat, award winner of "Best HR & Employment Law Consultancy, 2024" title. As featured in BBC Oline, BBC Asian Network Radio, Telegraph & more.Β 

Follow us for more articles and posts direct from professionals on      
  Report
Training and Development

Your managers are impacting your bottom line. But not in...

Hiring and promoting managers and letting them get on with it is a seriously dangerous mindset which can damage more…

Would you like to promote an article ?

Post articles and opinions on Berkshire Professionals to attract new clients and referrals. Feature in newsletters.
Join for free today and upload your articles for new contacts to read and enquire further.